Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Association Between Reflective Functioning and Parent–Child Relationship Quality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research consistently links adult and infant attachment styles, yet the means by which attachment is transmitted is relatively elusive. Recently, attention has been directed to the psychological underpinnings of caregiver sensitivity—originally thought to be the mechanism of transmission—as indicated by caregivers’ ability to keep in mind children’s mental states when interpreting children’s behavior, or reflective functioning. Unfortunately for researchers, extant measures of reflective functioning are time-consuming and require extensive observation and coding. A self-report measure could help facilitate the study and assessment of reflective functioning in research and clinical settings. This study investigated the relationship between parental reflective functioning and multiple aspects of the parent–child relationship, by using a new, self-report measure of reflective functioning. Participants were 79 caregivers (M age = 31.8 years) who completed self-report measures assessing reflective functioning, parent–child relationship characteristics, perceived rejection in early relationships, attachment anxiety and avoidance in current close relationships, depression, and substance use. The results indicated that reflective functioning is a strong predictor of parent–child relationship quality (i.e., parental involvement, communication, parent satisfaction, limit setting, and parental support), independent of other potential indicators. Findings support parental reflective functioning as a contributor to the quality of parent–child relationship and suggest that a parent’s capacity to reflect on the mental states of his or her child in parent–child interactions may provide a key target for interventions that aim to improve parent–child relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belsky, J., & Pasco Fearon, R. M. (2008). Precursors of attachment security. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (2nd ed., pp. 295–316). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, L. J., Zeanah, C. H., & Lieberman, A. F. (2008). Prevention and intervention programs for supporting early attachment security. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment (2nd ed., pp. 745–761). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthelot, N., Ensink, K., Bernazzani, O., Normandin, L., Luyten, P., & Fonagy, P. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of attachment in abused and neglected mothers: The role of trauma-specific reflective functioning. Infant Mental Health Journal, 36(2), 200–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s ties to this mother. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 350.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. L., & Rounds, L. A. (1995). Conjoint screening questionnaires for alcohol and other drug abuse: Criterion validity in a primary care practice. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 94(3), 135–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butzer, B., & Campbell, L. (2008). Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples. Personal Relationships, 15, 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, J. K., Guerin, D. W., & Gottfried, A. W. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Parent–Child Relationship Inventory (PCRI): Evidence from a longitudinal cross-informant investigation. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 209–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G., Hoffman, K., Powell, B., & Marvin, R. (2005). The circle of security intervention: Differential diagnosis and differential treatment. In L. J. Berlin, Y. Ziv, L. M. Amaya-Jackson, & M. T. Greenberg (Eds.), Enhancing early attachments: Theory, research, intervention, and policy (pp. 127–151). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wolff, M. S., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68(4), 571–591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Moran, G. S., & Higgitt, A. C. (1991). The capacity for understanding mental states: The reflective self in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 12(3), 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (1997). Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 679–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., & Target, M. (2005). Bridging the transmission gap: An end to an important mystery in attachment research? Attachment & Human Development, 7(3), 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., & Steele, M. (1998). Reflective functioning manual, version 5.0, for application to adult attachment interview. London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1984). The adult attachment interview. Unpublished protocol (3rd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, C., & Solomon, J. (1996). Representational models of relationships: Links between caregiving and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 17, 198–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, A. B. (1994). Parent–Child Relationship Inventory (PCRI) manual. Los Angeles: WPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grienenberger, J., Kelly, K., & Slade, A. (2005). Maternal reflective functioning, mother–infant affective communication, and infant attachment: Exploring the link between mental states and observed caregiving behavior in the intergenerational transmission of attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. L. (2015). Predictive (relational) methods. In Research methods: A modular approach (3rd edn, pp. 129–172). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

  • Khaleque, A., & Rohner, R. P. (2002). Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and psychological adjustment: A meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intracultural studies. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroenke, K., Strine, T. W., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Berry, J. T., & Mokdad, A. H. (2009). The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. Journal of Affective Disorders, 114, 163–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luyten, P., Mayes, L. C., Sadler, L., Fonagy, P., Nicholls, S., Crowley, M., et al. (2009). The Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire-1 (PRFQ-1). Leuven: University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of attachment organization: Recent studies, changing methodologies, and the concept of conditional strategies. Human Development, 33, 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ondersma, S. (2002). Predictors of neglect within low-SES families: The importance of substance abuse. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72, 383–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B., Cooper, G., Hoffman, K., & Marvin, B. (2013). The circle of security intervention: Enhancing attachment in early parent–child relationships. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnick, D. L., Bornstein, M. H., Lansford, J. E., Chang, L., Deater-Deckard, K., Di Giunta, L., et al. (2012). Agreement in mother and father acceptance-rejection, warmth, and hostility/rejection/neglect of children across nine countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(3), 191–223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rohner, R. P., & Khaleque, A. (2005). Handbook for the study of parental acceptance and rejection. Storrs, CT: Rohner Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, K. L., McDonough, S. C., Sameroff, A. J., & Muzik, M. (2008). Reflection in thought and action: Maternal parenting reflectivity predicts mind-minded comments and interactive behavior. Infant Mental Health Journal, 29(4), 362–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, H. J., Booth, C. R., Luyten, P., Bridgett, D. J., & Mayes, L. C. (2015). Investigating the association between parental reflective functioning and distress tolerance in motherhood. Infant Behavior & Development, 40, 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, H. J., Goldberg, B., Luyten, P., Bridgett, D. J., & Mayes, L. C. (2013). Parental reflective functioning is associated with tolerance of infant distress but not general distress: Evidence for a specific relationship using a simulated baby paradigm. Infant Behavior & Development, 36, 635–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, L. S., Slade, A., & Mayes, L. C. (2006). Minding the baby: A mentalization based parenting program. In J. G. Allen & P. Fonagy (Eds.), Handbook of mentalization-based treatment (pp. 271–288). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, C., & Fonagy, P. (2008). The parent’s capacity to treat the child as a psychological agent: Constructs, measures and implications for developmental psychopathology. Social Development, 17(3), 737–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, A. (2005). Parental reflective functioning: An introduction. Attachment and Human Development, 7, 269–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, A. (2006). Reflective parenting programs: Theory and development. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 26, 640–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, A., Grienenberger, J., Bernbach, E., Levy, D., & Locker, A. (2005). Maternal reflective functioning, attachment and the transmission gap: A preliminary study. Attachment and Human Development, 7(3), 283–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J., & George, C. (1996). Defining the caregiving system: Toward a theory of caregiving. Infant Mental Health Journal, 17(3), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, N., Decoste, C., Castiglioni, N., Legow, N., & Mayes, L. (2008). The mothers and toddlers program: Preliminary findings from an attachment-based parenting intervention for substance-abusing mothers. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25(3), 499–517.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. A. (2008). Early attachment and later development: Familiar questions, new answers. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 78–101). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1995). Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the adult attachment interview. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 387–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinfield, N. S., Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., & Carlson, E. (2008). Individual differences in infant–caregiver attachment: Conceptual and empirical aspects of security. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 78–101). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, K. (2009). Substance abuse and child maltreatment. Pediatrics Clinics of North America, 56, 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, Georgia State University, PO Box 3995, Atlanta, GA, 30302, USA

    Whitney L. Rostad & Daniel J. Whitaker

Authors
  1. Whitney L. Rostad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel J. Whitaker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Whitney L. Rostad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rostad, W.L., Whitaker, D.J. The Association Between Reflective Functioning and Parent–Child Relationship Quality. J Child Fam Stud 25, 2164–2177 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0388-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0388-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation