Skip to content

Judge Wrecking Ball: Going too far to keep towers being too tall

The city's going up, despite a judge's fanciful wish.
Jefferson Siegel / New York Daily News
The city’s going up, despite a judge’s fanciful wish.

Sorry, wrote Manhattan state Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron in siding with protesters over developers, the law isn’t really the law.

If his ruling is upheld upon appeal, what would have been three tall towers on the Manhattan waterfront with thousands of units of housing, including 690 affordable apartments, will have to go through the City Council’s land-use review process and may well get scotched entirely.

What awful precedent.

We know: The three Two Bridges towers on the Lower East Side are drastically taller than what was initially planned under the special redevelopment district planned way back in 1972, and last amended in 2013.

But that plan never happened, and developers came along looking to erect skinnier towers that reach higher, along with $15 million for parks, and $12.5 million for the nearby NYCHA development in the bargain. The special redevelopment district allows developers flexibility that wouldn’t require zoning changes — which is why City Planning officials judged taller towers a “minor modification” under the code, meaning something that doesn’t need Council permission.

Too bad, said the judge. Just feels too tall.

New York is growing rapidly. New, high-density developments are necessary to meet the demand for housing. Until we build it, small wonder we keep seeing residential housing prices scrape the sky.